User contributions on Wikipedia (23.03)
User contributions on Wikipedia (23.03)
Haplogroup O-M122: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
{{Short description|Y-chromosome DNA Haplogroup O2 (formerly O3)}}
My record :
23 February 2023
- curprev 10:33, 23 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 108,207 bytes −11 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 10:29, 23 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 108,218 bytes +10 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
20 February 2023
Haplogroup O-M117: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
{{Short description|Descendant branch of haplogroup O2a (formerly O3a)}}
'''Haplogroup O2a2b1a1-M117''' (also defined by the [[Phylogenetics|phylogenetically]] equivalent [[mutation]] Page23/F8/F42) is a [[subclade]] of O2a2b1-M134 (and also a subclade of [[haplogroup O-M122|haplogroup O2-M122]]) that occurs frequently in China and in neighboring countries like Nepal, Bhutan, and Korea, especially among [[Sino-Tibetan languages|Sino-Tibetan language]] speaking people. It is almost found in people related to [[Tang Dynasty]].
My record :
23 February 2023
24 February 2023
- curprev 06:59, 24 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 45,890 bytes +15 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
20 February 2023
- curprev 13:48, 20 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 45,875 bytes −1 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 13:45, 20 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 45,876 bytes +58 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 13:23, 20 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 45,818 bytes +59 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
7 November 2022
Haplogroup O-M268: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
{{Short description|Y-chromosome DNA Haplogroup O1b (formerly O2)}}
Besides its widespread and patchy distribution, Haplogroup O1b-P31 is also notable for the fact that it can be divided into three major subclades that show almost completely disjunct distribution. One of these subclades, O1B1-K18 can be mainly divided into two subclades O1b1a1-PK4 (formerly O2a) and O1b1a2-PAGE59 (formerly O2*(xM95,M176)). O1b1a1-PK4 is found among some (mostly tribal) populations of South and Southeast Asia, as well as among the [[Japanese people|Japanese]] of [[Japan]], the [[Javanese people| Javanese]], [[Sundanese people|Sundanese]], and [[Balinese people|Balinese]] of [[Indonesia]] and some [[Zhurong]] related Chinese. O1b1a2-PAGE59 is relatively rare and mainly distributed in East Asia, especially in some [[Yue (state)|Yue]], [[Baiyue]] related Chinese. Another subclade, Haplogroup [[Haplogroup O-M176 (Y-DNA)|O1b2-M176]] (formerly O2b), is found almost exclusively among the [[Japanese people|Japanese]], some [[Buyeo]] [[Koreans]] and [[Jin dynasty (1115–1234)|Jin]] [[Manchu people|Manchurians]].
My record :
23 February 2023
1 March 2023
- curprev 02:09, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 25,556 bytes +43 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
28 February 2023
- curprev 04:18, 28 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 25,513 bytes +30 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
27 February 2023
- curprev 05:03, 27 February 2023 116.126.223.199 talk 25,483 bytes +5 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
24 February 2023
- curprev 09:11, 24 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 25,478 bytes −703 Undid revision 1141290963 by Jhp3822 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
- curprev 08:57, 24 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 26,181 bytes +703 undoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 07:15, 24 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 25,478 bytes +24 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
23 February 2023
- curprev 10:33, 23 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 25,454 bytes −11 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 10:31, 23 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 25,465 bytes +11 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
20 February 2023
0 February 20
Haplogroup O-M175: Revision history
Haplogroup O-M119: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
{{Short description|Descendant branch of haplogroup O1a (formerly O1)}}
My record :
24 February 2023
- curprev 07:01, 24 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 63,854 bytes +14 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
20 February 2023
- curprev 13:48, 20 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs m 63,840 bytes −1 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 13:14, 20 February 2023 116.126.223.199 talk 63,841 bytes +59 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Wajin (ancient people): Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
The Wajin (and the Yayoi) are possibly descendants of the [[Wu (state)|Wu people]]. A large [[Paddy field|paddy]] ruins in the area was created around 450 BC, the [[Warring States period]], in [[Kyushu]], and a record states that "Wajin [were the] self-named descendants of Zhou". An influential theory states that the Wu people of the [[Yangtze|Yangtze River]] area that followed the [[Hydroponics|hydroponic]] rice cultivation culture, which is also a symbol of [[Yangtze civilization]], drifted to the Japanese archipelago around the 5th century BC, in collaboration with the destruction of the Kingdom of Wu.
However, the ancestors of the [[Wu (state)|Wu Dynasty]]’s Wu-Taibo was the descendant of Huangdi XuanYuan(黃帝軒轅),<ref>The Huangdi mentioned here means ‘[[Jie of Xia|Jī(姬)]] Huangdi distorted by the Chinese people in ancient time’ and ‘Gongsun(公孫) Huangdi before distortion’, the former among them.</ref> which is consistent with the ancestors of most modern Chinese.
The relationship between the Chinese immigrants of the Wu(吳) and the natives of the Yue(越) are inevitably hostile.
According to the records of the Hwangnyongsa Temple in [[Silla]], Silla's attention to the countries was first Japan(日本), second China(中華), and third '''Wuyue(吳越)'''.<ref>三國遺事([[Samguk Yusa]]) 卷 第三 > 塔像第四 > 皇龍寺九層塔 > 又海東名賢安弘撰東都成立記云. “新羅第二十七代女王爲主, 雖有道無威九韓侵勞. 若龍宫南皇龍寺建九層塔則隣國之災可鎮. 第一層日本, 第二層中華, 第三層吳越, 第四層托羅, 第五層鷹逰, 第六層靺鞨, 第七層丹國, 第八層女犾, 第九層獩㹮.</ref>
Based on this, it is presumed that Silla people thought separately of Wuyue(吳越) and China(中華), but the distinction disappeared as the Silla people were replaced by the Chinese people.<ref>It is claimed that Korea's Silla was founded by Six-clans of Gojoseon people, an immigrant from the northern part of the peninsula. The Six-clans of Gojoseon appears in the Samguk Sagi Record, which was written in 1145 by [[Kim Bu-sik|Chinese Korean]](Chinese Kim clan, not Korean Kim clan). But there are some suspicion about this record. The six-clans of Gojoseon are correspond to the Chinese surname distributed in northern China. If the six-clans existed from the early Silla period, they should exist from the early Japanese and Korean records. However, the first appearance of history books was in the 700s.</ref>
Just as Wuyue(吳越) and China(中華) were not distinguished over time, it is possible that Wu(吳) and Yue(越) were misunderstood so that they were not distinguished.
My record :
7 October 2022
- curprev 07:05, 7 October 2022 106.255.204.197 talk 7,574 bytes −2,088 Undid revision 1114583341 by Wikiwow1102 (talk) undo Tag: Undo
- curprev 07:03, 7 October 2022 Wikiwow1102 talk contribs 9,662 bytes +2,088 Undid revision 1114583266 by 106.255.204.197 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- curprev 07:02, 7 October 2022 106.255.204.197 talk 7,574 bytes −2,088 Re-fix undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- curprev 07:00, 7 October 2022 Wikiwow1102 talk contribs 9,662 bytes +2,086 Undid revision 1114582933 by 106.255.204.197 (talk) undo Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- curprev 06:59, 7 October 2022 106.255.204.197 talk 7,576 bytes −2,086 Deleted unrelated and groundless claims on Sillans in Baiyue and Wu section. undo Tag: Reverted
28 September 2022
- curprev 10:32, 28 September 2022 WikiCleanerBot talk contribs m 9,662 bytes 0 v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tags: WPCleaner Reverted
21 September 2022
- curprev 18:53, 21 September 2022 Jhp3822 talk contribs 9,662 bytes +2,088 →As Baiyue and Wu people: contradictory hypothesis about Wu (state) claim undo Tag: Reverted
Yemaek: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
The historian Sang-Yil Kim claims that the Koreanic Yemaek tribe did also influence the early Chinese culture. He suggests that the Yemaek tribe had a large cultural impact on [[East Asia]] and that at least some of the [[Dongyi]] were of proto-Korean origin.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=u7-SCzkMZgAC&q=yemaek+koreanic&pg=PA81|title=Haan (han, Han) of Minjung Theology and Han (han, Han) of Han Philosophy: In the Paradigm of Process Philosophy and Metaphysics of Relatedness|last=Son|first=Chang-Hee|date=2000|publisher=University Press of America|isbn=9780761818601|language=en}}</ref><ref>[[Seoul]] area, the capital of Korea, is included in Mahan(馬韓)'s area. According to record, Seoul area was originally the area of the Baekje, and the Baekje was once included in Mahan(馬韓), so there is no doubt about it. The name of the biggest river in Seoul is [[Han River (Korea)|Han River(漢江)]].
The definition of [[Samhan|Samhan(三韓)]] is very convenient for Chinese, and the pronunciation of Han(韓) and Han(漢) is exactly same. China's ‘abuse of record writting power’ is a point that must be taken care of in order to properly interpret East Asian history. According to Korean nationalists, Koreans are descendants of the [[Dongyi]].</ref><ref>秦楚 are both 夷狄. This is originally a ethnic name, and 秦楚 are destroyed by history distortion of the 夷 people. They are a very uncommon people with unique historical distortion method only for their reproduction. 說文解字: 夷 is the root of Chinese.</ref>
My record :
- curprev 03:24, 3 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 16,012 bytes +278 proof undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 03:09, 3 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 15,734 bytes +673 undoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
1 March 2023
- curprev 16:17, 1 March 2023 Sunnyediting99 talk contribs 15,061 bytes −56 Undid revision 1142207364 by Jhp3822 (talk) No citations, please cite if you make this claim undo Tag: Undo
- curprev 02:42, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 15,117 bytes +56 undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Zhurong: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
'''Zhurong''' ({{zh|c=祝融}}), also known as '''Chongli''' ({{zh|c=重黎}}){{Citation needed|date=March 2023}}, is an important personage in [[Chinese mythology]] and [[Chinese folk religion]]. According to the ''[[Huainanzi]]'' and the philosophical texts of [[Mozi]] and his followers, Zhurong is a god of fire and of the south.{{Citation needed|date=October 2020}}
The ''[[Shanhaijing]]'' gives alternative genealogies for Zhurong, including descent from both the [[Yan Emperor]] and [[Yellow Emperor]].{{sfn|Yang|An|Anderson Turner|2008|p=248}} However, it is recorded in suspicious part Dahuangjing(大荒經) and Haineijing(海內經) that were written last. Some sources associate Zhurong with some of the principal early and ancient myths of China, such as those of [[Nüwa]] ([[Nüwa Mends the Heavens]]), [[Gonggong]], and the [[Great Flood (China)|Great Flood]].{{sfn|Yang|An|Anderson Turner|2008|p=124}} Chinese mythology has in the past been believed to be, at least in part, a factual recording of history. Thus, in the study of historical Chinese culture, many of the stories that have been told regarding characters and events which have been written or told of the distant past have a double tradition: one tradition which presents a more historicised and one which presents a more mythological version.{{sfn|Yang|An|Anderson Turner|2008|pp=12-13}} This is also true in the case of Zhurong. In [[Sima Qian]]'s ''[[Records of the Grand Historian]]'' (''Shi Ji''), Zhurong is portrayed as a historical person, who held the governmental office of Minister of Fire.{{sfn|Hawkes|2011|p=81}}
However, in one myth, Zhurong was interested in physical power and fought against Gonggong for days in a contest to see who was stronger.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Bellingham |first=David |url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/27192394 |title=Myths and Legends |last2=Whittaker |first2=Clio |last3=Grant |first3=John |date= |publisher=Wellfleet Press |others= |year=1992 |isbn=1-55521-812-1 |location=Secaucus, New Jersey |pages=132 |oclc=27192394}}</ref> According to the [[Classic of Mountains and Seas|Haineijing]], [[Gonggong]] is a descendant of Zhurong.<ref>山海經 > 海內經 > 炎帝之妻,赤水之子聽訞生炎居,炎居生節竝,節竝生戲器,戲器生祝融,祝融降處於江水,生共工。共工生術器,術器首方顚,是復土穰,以處江水。共工生后土,后土生噎鳴,噎鳴生歳十有二</ref> This raises suspicions that Haineijing(海內經)'s record was distorted in [[Han dynasty|Han era]] for Chinese political purposes.
My record :
1 March 2023
- curprev 01:18, 1 March 2023 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 6,600 bytes +16 Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} undo
28 February 2023
- curprev 23:18, 28 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 6,584 bytes +19 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 23:10, 28 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 6,565 bytes +529 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 04:45, 28 February 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 6,036 bytes +116 undoTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
23 January 2023
Samhan: Revision history
&
Three Kingdoms of Korea: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
In China, the Three Kingdoms of Korea were collectively called Samhan since the beginning of the 7th century.<ref name="National">{{cite web |title=고현묘지명(高玄墓誌銘) |url=http://gsm.nricp.go.kr/_third/user/frame.jsp?View=search&No=4&ksmno=7190 |website=한국금석문 종합영상정보시스템 |publisher=National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage |access-date=10 September 2018}}</ref> The use of the name Samhan to indicate the Three Kingdoms of Korea was widespread in the [[Tang dynasty]].<ref name="kwon">{{cite journal |first=Deok-young |last1=Kwon |trans-title=An inquiry into the name of Three Kingdom(三國) inscribed on the epitaph of T'ang(唐) period |script-title=ko:唐 墓誌의 고대 한반도 삼국 명칭에 대한 검토 |journal=The Journal of Korean Ancient History |date=2014 |volume=75 |pages=105–137 |url=http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/ArticleDetail/NODE02486618 |access-date=2 July 2018 |language=ko |issn=1226-6213}}</ref> Goguryeo was alternately called [[Mahan confederacy|Mahan]] by the Tang dynasty, as evidenced by a Tang document that called Goguryeo generals "Mahan leaders" ({{Korean|마한추장|馬韓酋長|labels=no}}) in 645.<ref name="National" /> In 651, [[Emperor Gaozong of Tang]] sent a message to the king of Baekje referring to the Three Kingdoms of Korea as Samhan.<ref name="kyunghyang" /> Epitaphs of the Tang dynasty, including those belonging to Baekje, Goguryeo, and Silla refugees and migrants, called the Three Kingdoms of Korea "Samhan", especially Goguryeo.<ref name="kwon" /> For example, the epitaph of Go Hyeon ({{Korean|고현|高玄|labels=no}}), a Tang dynasty general of Goguryeo origin who died in 690, calls him a "Liaodong Samhan man" ({{Korean|요동 삼한인|遼東 三韓人|labels=no}}).<ref name="National" /> The [[History of Liao]] equates Byeonhan to Silla, Jinhan to Buyeo, and Mahan to Goguryeo.<ref name="chosun" />
[[Seoul]] area, the capital of Korea, is included in Mahan(馬韓)'s area. According to record, Seoul area was originally the area of the Baekje, and the Baekje was once included in Mahan(馬韓), so there is no doubt about it. The name of the biggest river in Seoul is [[Han River (Korea)|Han River(漢江)]].
The definition of Samhan(三韓) is very convenient for Chinese, and the pronunciation of Han(韓) and Han(漢) is exactly same.
China's ‘abuse of record writting power’ is a point that must be taken care of in order to properly interpret East Asian history.
According to Korean nationalists, Koreans are descendants of the [[Dongyi]] of the concept of being abused.
The content of the article after my change :
""
My record :
1 March 2023
- curprev 20:38, 1 March 2023 Bamnamu talk contribs 20,555 bytes −685 Undid revision 1142230392 by Jhp3822 (talk) unsourced undo Tag: Undo
- curprev 06:23, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 21,240 bytes +685 undoTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
1 March 2023
Jinhan confederacy: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
Jinhan, like the other Samhan confederacies, arose out of the confusion and migration following the fall of [[Wiman Joseon]] in 108 BC. Some Chinese records state that refugees from the [[Lelang Commandery|Lelang]] area sought asylum within the state of Jin (now Jinhan) after political turmoil of the [[Qin dynasty]].<ref>In fact, it is a historical distortion to justify the immigration of Chinese during the [[Tang Dynasty]]. Defined as the Gojoseon people's six-surname are consistent with the surnames of aristocrats, generals, and scholars of the Tang dynasty</ref>
My record :
1 March 2023
- curprev 06:48, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 6,445 bytes +253 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
10 October 2022
- curprev 21:33, 10 October 2022 Kolossoni talk contribs 6,192 bytes −6,420 Added new language section + cleaned up confusing information. undo Tag: Visual edit
//
Hyeokgeose of Silla: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
This legend reflects developments in the city-state stage, the six chieftains representing a loose group of [[Gojoseon]] refugees.<ref>However, strangely there are no evidence of relics.</ref> The story implies the ascendency of the Bak clan over the native peoples, and may indicate horse and [[sun]] worship.
The founding date is widely questioned today, as the ''[[Samguk Sagi]]'' was written from the viewpoint of [[Silla]], claiming Silla's superiority and antiquity over [[Goguryeo]] and [[Baekje]]. Silla in this traditional thinking is thought to have been founded first, followed by Goguryeo, and then Baekje.{{Citation needed|date=May 2010}} Archaeological evidence, however, paints a different picture, and it is suspected that Goguryeo is the oldest of the three kingdoms, with Silla developing either concurrently with Baekje or after it.{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}}
My record :
1 March 2023
- curprev 05:06, 1 March 2023 AnomieBOT talk contribs m 12,917 bytes +16 Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} undo
- curprev 03:05, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 12,901 bytes +19 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
- curprev 03:03, 1 March 2023 Jhp3822 talk contribs 12,882 bytes +62 undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit
Lady Saso: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
Nonetheless, Korean historians have long questioned her origins noting the case of [[Kim Bu-sik]], the [[Goryeo]] bureaucrat whom authored the [[Samguk Sagi]], having been clueless about these "tales and rumors" as he puts it. The Chinese guide Wang Fu (Traditional Chinese: 王黼) of the [[Song dynasty]] explained to Kim Bu-sik who saw the statue of a woman in Wuxingwan (Traditional Chinese: 佑神館) as someone who was "the goddess of [[Korea|your country]] who was a daughter of an old Chinese Emperor that fled East after being suspected of being pregnant without her husband." Kim Bu-sik thought these descriptions strange enough he nor the Korean people back then ever heard of such tales. There is also criticism that these tales are no different from old deifications related to Sinocentrism, claiming false Chinese or unidentified individuals as supposed ancestors as the practice were frequent back then.<ref>三國史記 > 卷第十二 新羅本紀 第十二 > 敬順王 > 論曰. 新羅朴氏·昔氏皆自卵生, 金氏從天入金樻而降, 或云乗金車. 此尤詭怪, 不可信, 然丗俗相傳, 爲之實事. 政和中, 我朝遣尚書李資諒入宋朝貢, 臣富軾以文翰之任輔行. 詣佑神舘, 見一堂設女仙像. 舘伴學士王黼曰, “此貴國之神, 公等知之乎.” 遂言曰, “古有帝室之女, 不夫而孕, 爲人所疑, 乃泛海, 抵辰韓生子, 爲海東始主. 帝女爲地仙, 長在仙桃山, 此其像也.” 臣又見大宋國信使王襄祭東神聖母文, 有“娠賢肇邦” 之句. 乃知東神則仙桃山神聖者也, 然而不知其子王於何時.</ref> On the other hand, under the pretext that she is in fact a long lost Chinese princess, some suspect her to be from either one of the dynasties during the [[Warring States period|Warring State Period]]; [[Qin dynasty|Qin]], [[Yan (state)|Yan]], and [[Wei (state)|Wei]] being likely candidates.{{Citation needed|date=March 2023}} Others presume she was the princess of the [[Qin dynasty|Qin Dynasty]] due to the passage in the [[Book of Jin]] quoting, "[[Qin dynasty|Qin(秦)]]'s old immigrants fled to [[Jinhan]] to avoid harsh labor."
My record :
9 March 2023
28 October 2022
Namhae of Silla: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
The Bukmyeong(北溟) people plowed the fields and got ''Royal Seal of Ye''(Hangul:예왕지인, Hanja:濊王之印), previously used by [[Buyeo]]'s kings, and dedicated it to Silla in 19. It is not clear where Bukmyeong means.<ref>三國史記 新羅本紀 南解 次次雄 > 十六年春二月 北溟人耕田 得濊王印 獻之</ref><ref>三國志魏書 東夷傳 夫餘 > 其印文言「濊王之印」, 國有故城名濊城, 蓋本濊貊之地,而夫餘王其中, 自謂「亡人」, 抑有似也</ref>
My record :
23 February 2023
Yuri of Silla: Revision history
The content of the article after my change :
These surnames are believed to have imitated Chinese surnames that were frequently contacted.</ref><ref>However, the actual appearance of the surname was the late Silla period.</ref><ref>It is claimed that Korea's Silla was founded by Six-clans of Gojoseon people, an immigrant from the northern part of the peninsula. The Six-clans of Gojoseon appears in the Samguk Sagi Record, which was written in 1145 by [[Kim Bu-sik|Chinese Korean]](Chinese Kim clan, not Korean Kim clan). But there are some suspicion about this record. The six-clans of Gojoseon are correspond to the Chinese surname distributed in northern China. If the six-clans existed from the early Silla period, they should exist from the early Japanese and Korean records. However, the first appearance of history books was in the 700s.</ref> He is also said to have created 17 bureaucratic rank levels. However, modern scholars doubt that these occurred so early in Silla's development.
My record :
Comments
Post a Comment